A new report is coming out from NACAC questioning the importance of using tests such as SAT/ACT in college admissions. NACAC sends a pretty resounding NO. The association calls for ending the testing requirements for admissions, but not without advocating institution-specific validity studies on the topic (which I think is great because it permits an opportunity to look at institutional mission/goals/outcomes that are unique). Many of the institutions, such as the University of California, which have engaged in this type of study, have found that tests do not help in admissions, and confirm that high school grades are far more important in determining college success. The report outlines the often-sited ills of SAT/ACT, including racial bias, ability to be coached for the test, and the influence of media or business enterprise on the development and continued use of the test. It also takes a look at institutions that have gone test-optional or eliminated tests in their admissions processes, including Hamilton University and Wake Forest U.
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/09/22/testing
If they aren't helping college readiness in ways that promote alignment of college-level expectations or identifies high school learning outcomes, it's just one more reason to do away with SAT/ACT. Bring on PISA and/or subject tests!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
ACT/SAT admission requirements seem to be deeply rooted in a tradition that will take time to change. There is also the powerful impact of the economic consequences when these tests are no longer needed for college admission. As more attention is directed toward college readiness and predictors for success, it will be interesting to watch this unfold.
Post a Comment